European route: OLAF, EPPO, General Court, ECtHR and Council of Europe

The European route of the case fits in a chronology of dates and references. This annex documents it in full: what was communicated, to whom, when, and what reply is on record.

What it contains

• OLAF: complaint of 19-9-2024 (case 18907; A.68.1), Article 265 TFEU request of 1-10-2025 (A.68.3), whistleblower-protection request of 27-1-2026 (case 24469; A.68.4) and acknowledgement of the follow-up with the mailbox still unanswered as of 31-1-2026 (A.68.5).
• European Parliament: registration of Petition 1070/2024 (17-9-2024; A.68.2) and updates of 15-9-2025 and 4-3-2026 (A.68.13).
• EPPO: letter of 10-3-2026 declining competence, referring to OLAF and closing the file (A.68.6).
• General Court: application T-328/24 of 18-11-2024 and subsequent requests and complaint (A.68.8).
• ECtHR and Council of Europe: reply to the Rule 39 request (29-1-2026; A.68.9), letter to the President of the Court (9-3-2026; A.68.10), rectification with the signed forensic report (12-3-2026; A.68.11) and letter to PACE (16-3-2026; A.68.12).

What it establishes

• The whistleblower-protection request was registered on the very day of the urgent heart surgery (27-1-2026); as of 31-1-2026 the mailbox was still empty.
• The request for urgent measures to the ECtHR, filed two days after that surgery, was answered the same 29-1-2026: the request «has not been submitted to a judge for decision».
• The four ECtHR applications (22595/20, 32438/22, 15094/24, 3459/26) all ended in single-judge inadmissibility, without examination of the merits.
• The EPPO, in declining competence, referred the matter to the very body —OLAF— whose complaint had been unresolved since 19-9-2024.

Is there an ordinary explanation?

Each piece, in isolation, has one: institutions filter thousands of matters and distribute them by competence. What this annex lays bare is the complete series: six different routes in eighteen months and no decision on the merits in any of them. The accumulation, dated and referenced, is the datum.

Check it yourself

Open any piece of the annex, find its date and reference number, and search the file for the decision on the merits that answers it. As of 12 June 2026, that search returns the same result in all six routes.