Application before the European Court of Human Rights on 24 June 2022, and Resolution of Non-admission
Apolozan case · ERDF fraud (Bilbao / Alicante / EU)
With the internal avenue closed, the European Convention offers its own. This annex documents the first attempt and its result.
The application
- Filed on 24 June 2022, within the time limit of Article 35 ECHR from the non-admission of the constitutional appeal (A.31).
- It invoked: Article 6 (fair trial), 6.2 (presumption of innocence), 8 (private and family life) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).
- It accompanied the documentary file: registry, administrative, audiovisual and patrimonial enforcement.
The result
The ECtHR did not admit it in single-judge format, with no material reasoning — the channel by which the Court disposes of the majority of the applications it receives. The merits — the dates, the registries, the cuts in the trial — remained unexamined in Strasbourg too.
The series datum
With this non-admission, the list of bodies that did not examine the documentary comparison adds its fifth element, now outside Spain. The 2024 application (A.39) would return to Strasbourg with what this one could not include: the 2023 forensic report on the recordings (A.33) and the internal refusal of the review (A.38).
How to verify it
Compare the date of filing with the time limit of Article 35 ECHR from A.31; read the included non-admission decision. The applicant's diligence file — each avenue, within its time limit, with its document — is composed of these pieces.
Contrast with the original file
The complete ECtHR file appears in Bilbao Original: form (DOC-0164, DOC-0177), stamped copy (DOC-0167), certified post receipt of 24-6-2022 (DOC-0178) and the non-admission decisions (DOC-0165, DOC-0166).
Documentary evidence · A.32 · 24 June 2022 · European and international projection
EuroFraud case file · every statement links to its document (A.X / DOC-XXXX). Evidentiary material; every person named is presumed innocent.