Complaint against Investigating Court No. 8 and the Bilbao Prosecutor's Office

This document belongs to the case's series of formal alerts: the second directed against the Bilbao circuit, this time about the investigation itself.

What it sets out and what it attaches

The complaint points out, with documentary reference: the adoption of the complaint's account without contrast (A.8, A.9), the omission of the registry chronology (A.1, A.3), the unconfronted requirement of powers (A.4) and the use of arrest for non-location (A.13). It makes no judgements of intent: it lists documents and requests their examination.

The procedural fate

• No verification step on record taken as a result of the complaint.
• No reasoned resolution on record answering it.
• The complainant's statements in the main proceedings met a similar fate; the trial's audiovisual recording documents the treatment they received in the courtroom (A.19).

Its value in the file

It proves the exhaustion of the internal alert channels before turning to higher and European bodies: the Administration was warned in 2012 (A.12); the investigation and the Prosecutor's Office, by means of this document. No body in the circuit can claim ignorance — the warning is on record as filed and registered.

How to verify it

Locate in the file the response to this complaint. The fruitless search is, once again, the fact.