TWENTY-ONE PROPERTIES FOR €178,000 — AND AN EVICTION WITH A MINOR

The enforcement did not merely collect: it razed. The seizure reached twenty-one properties (A.41). Among them, the main plot in Medgidia: 30,000 square metres whose feasibility study — incorporated into the seizure file itself — valued it at 6,900,000 euros, with a project of 630 dwellings under development. That piece alone multiplied the enforced debt thirty-nine times over. The law — Spanish and Romanian — requires proportionality between what is owed and what is seized; here an entire estate was immobilised and, with it, the project of a lifetime.

And while the State over-collected, it withheld what it owed. This portal's documentary series proves input VAT never refunded of some 230,000 euros (A.46, A.49, A.66) — more than the enforced debt itself. The "debtor" was, on a net balance, a creditor. The insolvency that justified a decade of pursuit was an accounting construction with the sign reversed.

The end of this branch is from June 2022, and it did not happen in Romania but in Alicante: the eviction (A.55). Beforehand, the defence had requested interim measures expressly invoking the presence of a minor — requests of 19-2-2021, with referral to the Juvenile Prosecutor's Office, and of 11-8-2021 (A.53, A.54). They were not denied: they were not answered. In any sense. The channel that does not work even to say no.

A family with a minor, evicted while the State withheld more money than it was claiming from him. That sentence, with its five annexes behind it, is the financial summary of this case.