Application for Interim Measures, Court No. 2, and Juvenile Prosecutor's Office
Apolozan case · ERDF fraud (Bilbao / Alicante / EU)
The interim measures of Article 130 of the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction Act exist so that the time of the process does not consummate the harm. This application added a datum that exceeds the patrimonial: a minor.
The brief
- Filed on 19 February 2021 — "What I ask in Alicante is just" — in proceedings 444/2020 (A.52) and before the Juvenile Prosecutor's Office of Alicante.
- It sets out: the custody of the minor son held by the applicant after the mother's abandonment — a fact reported in the same court, with references of February 2021 — and the economic situation resulting from the attachments and expropriations (A.41).
- It requests: measures of economic or housing assistance for the family unit.
The recipients and their frameworks
The contentious court had Article 130 of the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction Act to order interim measures; the Juvenile Prosecutor's Office, the legal mandate to safeguard the best interest of the minor. Neither of the two frameworks requires success on the merits of the dispute: both operate on the risk during its pendency.
What is on record
No interim measure ordered, no protection action by the Juvenile Prosecutor's Office, nor a resolution denying it with reasons is on record. The file continued towards the 2022 eviction (A.55) with this application registered in it.
How to verify it
Look in proceedings 444/2020 and in the register of the Juvenile Prosecutor's Office for the response to this brief. The entry record exists; the response is what is missing.
Documentary evidence · A.53 · 19 February 2021 · Investigation and coercion
EuroFraud case file · every statement links to its document (A.X / DOC-XXXX). Evidentiary material; every person named is presumed innocent.