Eviction, Court of First Instance No. 14

Apolozan case · ERDF fraud (Bilbao / Alicante / EU)

Eviction, Court of First Instance No. 14

This annex requires no argumentation: it is the accounting result of all the previous ones, with a judicial stamp.

The procedure

  • Eviction processed before the Court of First Instance No. 14, with proceedings of June 2022.
  • Affected: the defendant and the minor son in his care (A.53).
  • Immediate antecedent: the two unanswered interim measures of 2021 requesting, precisely, a housing alternative (A.53, A.54).

The account that ends here

  • Real-estate assets: enforced in two countries on a time-barred tax year and an assessment without costs (A.40, A.41, A.49).
  • VAT credit: claimed and unrefunded (A.42, A.46).
  • Technological project: valued at 1,778,000 euros by the Administration itself (A.10).
  • Result: a family with no home.

The insolvency that culminates in this eviction is not a starting point of the case: it is its product, traceable document by document.

From silence to eviction, in dates

19-2-2021 — first application for interim measures, with the minor invoked, also before the Juvenile Prosecutor's Office (A.53) → 11-8-2021 — second application for interim measures (A.54) → (no date) — no resolution of either is on record, in any sense → 6-2022 — eviction of the family home, Court of First Instance No. 14

A contrast of locations

The files that ruined him repeatedly alleged his non-location (A.13, A.16, A.41); the procedure that evicted him located him without difficulty. The same person, the same address, two results according to the convenience of the file — all the documents are on record.

How to verify it

Order the dates: expropriations, unanswered interim measures, eviction. The complete timeline fits on one page — and each point has its document in this chronology.

The factThe 2022 eviction closed the sequence: enforced in two countries, with the VAT unrefunded, the interim measures unanswered and a minor in his care — each link with its document.
The questionWhat to call the procedure that turns a creditor of the treasury, with expert-assessed works and a project valued at 1.7 million, into an evicted man with a minor son?

Documentary evidence · A.55 · 2 June 2022 · Investigation and coercion
EuroFraud case file · every statement links to its document (A.X / DOC-XXXX). Evidentiary material; every person named is presumed innocent.